Background Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is usually a disease with high morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients. sub-scores were utilized as impartial predictors for IAH logistic backward analysis. Thirty-seven intensivists participated in the survey (response rate: 80.43?%). The average score of each center was less than 35 points. All physicians believed the IAH prevalence in their departments was no more than 20.00?%. A significant negative correlation was observed between the intensivists Tideglusib awareness of the 2013 WSACS guidelines and the IAH prevalence in each center (the catheter after emptying. The midaxillary collection was set as the zero reference plane, and the IVP value was read at the end of the measurement period by central venous pressure monitoring units (Medifix, B.Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany), expressed in mmHg (1?mmHg?=?1.36 cmH2O). The frequency of IVP measurements was once every 4?h. Each measurement was repeated within a three-minute interval, and the average was used as the measurement value to minimize reading errors. Questionnaire survey The epidemiological investigation and questionnaire study of each ICU was performed in the same survey period. The paper-and-pencil questionnaires were completed by intensivists with ICU operating experience of more than 5?years to determine their awareness of the 2013 WSACS recommendations. The questionnaire experienced a total score of 100 points and was divided into three types of questions: 15 points for true or false, 45 for single-choice, and 40 for multiple-choice. Topics included fundamental IAH/ACS concepts, methods and indications of IAP monitoring, and non-surgical Tideglusib and surgical treatment strategies. Intensivists were also asked to speculate about the IAH prevalence in their departments. Statistical analysis Measurement data were indicated with the mean??SD or median (interquartile range). Continuous variables with normal distribution were compared using attest. Abnormally distributed variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Multiple groups were compared using One-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Frequencies were compared using the Pearson Chi-Square test and Fishers precise test. Logistic backward regression was used to Tideglusib analyze the self-employed risk factors of IAH. A linear correlation and regression analysis was applied to define the relationship between questionnaire scores and IAH prevalence. <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The software SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was utilized for statistical analysis. Results Among the 64 individuals in the four ICUs, 41 met the inclusion criteria (64.06?%) and 23 (35.94?%) without bladder catheters were excluded. No factor in demographic details between your IAH and non-IAH groupings C5AR1 was noticed (Desk?1). The common IAH prevalence among surveyed sufferers was 36.59?%, but no factor in IAH prevalence among the four surveyed centers was observed ((IAH prevalence)?=?292.874-8.248 X (awareness level) (R2?=?0.951, F?=?38.813, P?=?0.025). Debate The analysis of epidemiology is essential for identifying the determinants and distribution of disease in a particular people. WSACS attaches great importance to epidemiological research among numerous kinds of sufferers. Latest epidemiological data on the subject of sick individuals attended mainly from traditional western countries critically. The prevalence prices of IAH vary considerably in the books because of different statistical strategies and IAP dimension strategies. IAH prevalence fluctuates from 17.5C63.86?% [5, 12] but is targeted in approximately 30 mainly?% [13, 14]. The IAH prevalence (36.59?%) of today’s study is comparable to that reported in the books, which shows a higher risk among people of different countries and races. We found that individuals with IAH experienced higher SOFA scores than non-IAH individuals, which is consistent with the literature . However, there is still a lack Tideglusib of epidemiological data about critically ill Chinese IAH individuals. Awareness of IAH risk factors is the basis of disease prevention. As early as 2006, WSACS acknowledged the importance of IAH with the slogan, Its time to pay attention! . The list of risk factors published in the 2013 WSACS recommendations was established on the basis of a series of studies . We screened the specific risk factors of the surveyed individuals. Although we did not enlarge the spectrum of IAH risk factors, our results may help to clarify the epidemiological features of particular populations and to enrich the database of distribution of the risk factors among different races and countries. Our getting is similar to that reported by Blaser et al. , namely, which the SOFA liver organ sub-score can be an unbiased predictor of IAH. Furthermore, we discovered that the SOFA neurological sub-score can be an independent IAH risk element also. A possible explanation may be that some unconscious.